From: nescivi <ne...@gm...> - 2009-01-27 16:46:58
|
Hiho, On Tuesday 27 January 2009 04:59:13 Florian Schmidt wrote: > Hi again, > > On Tuesday 27 January 2009, nescivi wrote: > > > Was it posted on the sc-lists? If so, i will look for details there. If > > > not, do you mind elaborating? :) > > > > I did not post it.. > > > > I had a couple of issues with the svn version: > > for compilation I had to change one header inclusion from "glew.h" to > > <glew.h>, otherwise I got link errors in runtime with the renderer. > > Ok. As far as i can tell this should not be necessary (at least not since i > integrated glew into the build directly), but i'll have another look.. Well... should I then have glew from my distribution uninstalled? > > The other messages were about synthdefs not being found, and wrong > > numbers of arguments to n_sets. > > > > I don't have time to go back and look at exactly how things went wrong > > right now, as my priority is getting stuff to work, so for now I'm > > holding back and using the setup that I know worked stable. > > Which is actually fine with me, too. Less bug reports means less work > fixing bugs ;) well.. just postponing... cause I will get back to this stuff, once production pressure is over. > Maybe you can tell me though, which operating system > (distribution) you're using. I just might try to install it in a kvm, to > see whether i can reproduce the problems.. Debian unstable. > > I'm not sure whether it is elaborately documented... > > asOSCargs is now used, instead of what it used to be, and the array > > options have been introduced. > > But Julian has probably followed it more closely... > > Ok.. sincerely, Marije |