From: <nic...@in...> - 2016-08-02 14:05:52
|
Hi Nils, Do you think it is possible or not? :) Your last sentence let me think it is, but reading again the help of each existing rules I don't see how. Regards, Nicolas On 02-08-2016 09:09, nl...@us... wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > unfortunately this is not possible. Whenever the custom rules are not > sufficient to determine a unique parent scaffold, a tie-break rule is > applied. > This is repeated until a scaffold with a single ring is obtained. In > general, > all scaffold with the same number of rings have the same depth in the > scaffold > tree. > > However, it should be possible to define a set of rules such that fused > rings > are preserved until no other rings can be removed. > > > Regards, > Nils > > > > > > On Thursday 28 July 2016 11:57:54 nic...@in... wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I use scaffold hunter for a few days and despite some difficulties for >> using it I think it is a great tool for scaffold generations and tree >> visualization. >> >> I read the manual and also took a look of the related articles but I >> have some issues to use the ruleset management. Basically, when I >> generate the tree, I would like not to split "fused rings". >> >> As an example, in J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2007, 47 (1), pp 47–58, in >> scheme 18, I would like the molecules with the "fused rings" to be the >> smallest scaffolds. Could tell me how to perform? >> >> Thank you for any help. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Nicolas >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- _______________________________________________ >> Scaffoldhunter-users mailing list >> Sca...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scaffoldhunter-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Scaffoldhunter-users mailing list > Sca...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scaffoldhunter-users |