From: <nl...@us...> - 2013-04-25 08:01:59
|
Hi Prateek, On Thursday 25 April 2013 12:17:59 Prateek Gupta wrote: > I also used the 2.2 version of the scaffolhunter software.I came across > multiple differences between the 1.7 to 2.2 version. > I understood my previous doubts after using the software more thoroughly. > But I want to what exactly is meant by > "calculation of fingerprints for effective filtering as well as a subgraph > isomorphism algorithm for validation, but lacks integration in the current > filtering framework" . > What are the discrepancies that are targetted. as you have seen, the current filtering framework is slightly different from the one used in the previous releases (v1.x). Another difference is that the new version uses Hibernate for object-relational mapping and is more independent of the database server used. However, this level of abstraction might prohibit some (MySQL-specific) database queries used in the previous version. For example, the filtering based on bit operations on the database site might be problematic. A good approach should be compatible with most database servers while still being as efficient as possible. This requires to investigate the operations supported by Hibernate and it might also help to do some test runs first to come up with feasible practical solution. Regards Nils |