From: sacspam <sa...@pr...> - 2006-02-20 21:59:16
|
sav...@ho... wrote: > Hi all, > After reading the Atari article I did some checking up. I am from the > Pong era and have been a Atari fan for a long time. This may seem like > I'm going off on a tangent but there is a point. Atari is for lack of > a better term "old school and old money" in the sodtware industry. The > problem with "old" is that they tend to try to stick to old practices > and methods. This hinders a younger software generation from > programmers to gamers. I beleive the loss of CEO will bring down the > company and the fact that HSBC is a terrible financial agency. They > loose the human factor of business and often set unrealistic criteria > for loans. However for the SC2 groups out there this may be a shining > light. I believe that Atari should be contacted and be offered a bid > for the rights to SC2. I beleive it should be a community effort not > one based on a individual or a company. This was made for the people > and should be owned by the people. I believe we should setup a paypal > or other type of way o > f making donations to put up for bid on the title. Being in Iraq I > have a little extra put aside that I would more than wish to donate > for the cause. SC2 encopassed alot of time when I was a young soldier > and I'm so enjoying it again since it was ported. There is a good fan > base and I think we should keep it that way. I'm sure that Atari would > see it that way as well. Thanks I think it'd be great if the SC2 trademark was released to the community. However, before we get ahead of ourselves, we'd need to have some idea (at least an order-of-magnitude guess) of how much money would be required. Also, note that it could be a bad move to take up a collection in any publicly viewable way, since if it goes to a bankruptcy auction, it's important to keep the potential amount of your bid secret. ----Scott |