|
From: Chris N. <ch...@to...> - 2003-01-05 21:28:02
|
It seems as though the spirit of the first license I proposed a while ago was on target, but some of its the wording left a little to be desired. As such, I've found another license which I believe might work for the art in UQM. The Free Media License: https://expressivefreedom.org/copyleft/fml-intro.html The author explicitly states that this license is based on concepts from the GPL, and it seems to me as though sc cloners could use the art we provide under this license, if they released their game under the GPL. Is this how everyone else reads the license? If there was any doubt, we could also explicitly grant permission for this. Would that work for everyone? If people could submit their analysis of this license to the list, it would be helpful. And, of course, if anybody knows of a better license, please post that, too. -- Chris Nelson <ch...@to...> TFB |