From: Christoph F. <xt...@tb...> - 2011-04-12 07:36:26
|
hi rainer, hi takahashi, in my opinion it is a good idea to move the source of SBML_odeSolver from sourceforge to github. however i think that rainer or someone from TBI should be the owner of the main repository at github.com with kind regards, christoph -- Christoph Flamm Institut fuer Theoretische Chemie | email: xt...@tb... Universitaet Wien | phone: ++43-1-4277-527-39 Waehringerstrasse 17/3/308 | fax: ++43-1-4277-527-93 A-1090 Wien, Austria | www: http://www.tbi.univie.ac.at/~xtof Takeshi Abe writes: > Hi Rainer, > > On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 09:37:18 +0900 (JST), Takeshi Abe <ta...@fi...> wrote: > >> One of our first moves might however be to move the code from sourceforge to > >> github. Opinions on that? > > I think GitHub is a good way to go because many of developers are familiar > > with its usage today. > In order to check how a migration looks like I have tried to port the current > CVS repository to GitHub's one of mine: > https://github.com/tabe/SBML_odeSolver > It is achieved with git-cvsimport(1). Note that there is only the "master" > branch on the above repository, but the command also dumps other branches > such as 'physiomics'. > HTH. > > Cheers, > -- Takeshi Abe > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers. > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision. > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo > _______________________________________________ > sbmlsolver-discuss mailing list > sbm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbmlsolver-discuss |