Re: [SOSlib-discuss] ODEModel_createWithObservables[Scanned]

[Eric F. <efe...@ph...>]

Hi,

No objection from me, that sounds good.

Eric 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rainer Machne [mailto:ra...@tb...] 
> Sent: 03 October 2008 09:33
> To: sbm...@li...
> Subject: [SOSlib-discuss] ODEModel_createWithObservables[Scanned]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Is anyone using the functions to create an ODEModel "WithObservables"?
> 
> I plan to move this to CvodeSettings_setObservables (and to 
> move the respective structures and functions to CvodeData).
> 
> The reason is, that odeModel otherwise only depends on the 
> SBML input, and defining "observables" fits more natural to 
> the input settings.
> Also, one odeModel can then be run with different observables 
> sets, and observables don't depend on the odeModel anymore.
> 
> fyi, the rule-ordering, which made observables necessary, is 
> currently being replaced with a topological sorting-based 
> ordering (to allow SBML
> L2V2 initial assignments, and lost constraints on rule ordering).
> 
> Is that a problem for anyone?
> 
> Thanks,
> Rainer
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move 
> Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based 
> applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize 
> is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the 
> world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> sbmlsolver-discuss mailing list
> sbm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbmlsolver-discuss
>