From: Rainer M. <ra...@tb...> - 2006-05-24 16:18:18
|
> The latest source breaks our large model. > Can people summarize the changes that have been checked in recently... I am just looking at the online CVS at sourceforge http://sbmlsolver.cvs.sourceforge.net/sbmlsolver/SBML_odeSolver/src/?sortby=date#dirlist After your last commit I have just repaired the simple event handling in integratorInstance.c and cvodedata.c, as discussed with you before. Maybe that is breaking your model? You mentioned back then, that you might get problems. My other changes are the declaration for the local functions in integratorInstance.c and some editing towards the style convention. Stefan has made some changes, of which I don't know yet, if they might break anything. To find out maybe you can try the files before his commit (download from online CVS e.g.) Rainer > Has the accurate event detection been checked in? No. On Wed, 24 May 2006, Andrew Finney wrote: > Folks > > The latest source breaks our large model. > Can people summarize the changes that have been checked in recently... > > Has the accurate event detection been checked in? > > yours Andrew > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! > Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in > the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd_______________________________________________ > sbmlsolver-devel mailing list > sbm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbmlsolver-devel > |