From: Witold W. <wew...@gm...> - 2006-05-01 12:53:49
|
Hi, I am struggling to understand the code, not only because of its complexity but also because, finding the next variable named for example m, r, k, om etc. is tedious. Therefore, I would suggest to define a variable Model_t * model_p instead of just Model_t *m. Using model_p as a variable name makes it easy to find, makes clear that the variable is of type model, and finally that it is a pointer (_p). Any comments? Eryk |