In a discussion about the FBA package, Brett Olivier commented, "Personally it is not clear to me how the conclusion on lines 2-3 on Page 58 of the SBML L3V1 specification was reached and how it could be implemented ;-)"
The line in question states:
"Constraints may be used as input to non-dynamical analysis, for instance by expressing flux constraints for flux balance analysis."
And indeed, it seems as if Constraints are the wrong tool for that job (and is why the FBC package defines its own 'FluxBounds' which are otherwise similar to Constraints).
In light of that, should we simply remove that line from the specification?
Log in to post a comment.