#230 No validation warning for negative/zero stoichiometries

[Lucian Smith]

In the description of the 'stoichiometry' attribute, the spec reads:

"The stoichiometry attribute is of type double and should contain values greater than zero (0)"

However, while there is a validation error for the first bit (21114), there is no validation warning (that I could find) that covers the second bit ('it should be greater than zero'). We should add one!

EDIT: The consensus was to not add a validation rule, and instead to remove the "should contain values of greater than zero" line.

[Lucian Smith]

Just a comment: because this change was made for l2v5 as well as l3v2, it seems reasonable to also make the change for l3v1r2, now that we're creating such a beast.

[Sarah Keating]

I agree.