#121 Should mention using SBO for conservation expressions

Rejected-No_action
closed
5
2014-04-04
2008-07-01
No

Some past discussions on sbml-discuss lead to the idea that SBO terms could be used to annotate a model to indicate rules that represent moiety conservation expressions. See for example this thread:

http://sbml.org/Forums/index.php?t=tree&th=1092&mid=4505&rid=2&rev=&reveal=

Currently, however, the SBML spec does not mention this idea. I propose that we add some text about it for L2v4. The text would be at least in the section about SBO, and maybe there would be mention or references in other parts of the spec as well (e.g., in the section on rules).

Discussion

  • Sarah Keating

    Sarah Keating - 2008-07-03

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=641982
    Originator: NO

    I agree with the proposed change and that it should be done.

     
  • Nicolas Le Novère

    • status: open --> pending
     
  • Nicolas Le Novère

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=1045203
    Originator: NO

    I am accepting this issue as valid.

     
  • Nicolas Le Novère

    • assigned_to: nobody --> lenov
     
  • SourceForge Robot

    • status: pending --> closed
     
  • SourceForge Robot

    This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was
    previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter
    did not respond within 730 days (the time period specified by
    the administrator of this Tracker).

     
  • Michael Hucka

    Michael Hucka - 2010-09-22

    Reopening the item. Screw the damn bot.

     
  • Michael Hucka

    Michael Hucka - 2010-09-22
    • status: closed --> pending
     
  • Nicolas Le Novère

    I propose to close that one. It is not the job of SBML specifications to tell people what they could do with it, even less in the case where the result would potentially be an inconsistence between syntax and semantics.

     
  • Lucian Smith

    Lucian Smith - 2014-04-04

    It looks to me like this ended up being rejected in the end, or at least died unnoticed. Someone change the status if I'm wrong.

     
  • Lucian Smith

    Lucian Smith - 2014-04-04
    • status: pending --> closed
    • Group: Reported-Proposed --> Rejected-No_action
     

Log in to post a comment.

Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:

JavaScript is required for this form.





No, thanks