Re: [Sblim-devel] Java VM bug?

[Marcin G. <go...@go...>]

On Mon 19. November 2001 15:44, you wrote:

> In terms of data consistency and performance a provider cache
> would not be the best solution for FSVOL . That solution
> would force overhead in memory management and you lose
> performance . Its not necessary for this kind of provider .
> Maybe in another content such a solution would be the best
> way to go but here I recommend to use the direct access .

Well, some kind cache is inevitable IMHO. Simply enumInstancesNames returns 
names of currently mounted filesystems but before CIMOM issues a getInstance 
somebody could remount some of the filesystems, so getInstance would have to 
return an error which isn't an expected behaviour. Or was this whole 
situation thought of before and it's covered somewhere in the CIMOM specs I 
haven't got the opportunity to read?

-- 
Marcin Gozdalik <go...@go...>