Re: [Sblim-devel] Java VM bug?

[Marcin G. <go...@go...>]

On Sun 18. November 2001 19:45, you wrote:

> rationale behind your "Provider Cache" thoughts, as I do not see that a
> getInstance call would result in enumInstances (although I could imagine
> that this happens for associators).

The rationale behind my idea is the new getInstance fsvol implementation:

  nameSpace = CIMObjectPathGetNameSpace( nh , cop );
  cLD = CIMObjectPathNew( nh, "Linux_LocalFileSystem" );
  CIMObjectPathSetNameSpace( nh , cLD , nameSpace );
->vi = CIMOMEnumInstances( nh , cLD ,0 ,0);
  size = VectorSize(nh,vi);
  nm  = CIMObjectPathGetStringKeyValue( nh, cop, "Name");

I think that it's simply easier to do this locally, without involving CIMOM 
to do enumInstances for us. Since getInstance is called after enumInstances 
has been called I think enumInstances could cache all the relevant 
information so that getInstance would be faster.
This observation also grew from the speed of executing getInstance on 
not-so-weak machine (Duron 750,384MB RAM) with SNIA CIMOM - enumInstances was 
acceptable but clicking on any Linux_LocalFileSystem in openCIMOM browser 
takes 1-2 seconds to execute which I think is pretty bad.

Cheers,
Marcin

-- 
Marcin Gozdalik <go...@go...>