Re: [Sblim-devel] Java VM bug?

[<mih...@t-...>]

Hi Marcin,

I let Heidi answer the fsvol and LVM questions (out of politeness and as 
  I'm not competent enough to do so :-). But I wanted to understand the 
rationale behind your "Provider Cache" thoughts, as I do not see that a 
getInstance call would result in enumInstances (although I could imagine 
that this happens for associators).

Marcin Gozdalik (by way of Marcin Gozdalik ) wrote:
 >

> I'm not sure, but from what you're saying getInstance gets only "Name"
> property? I couldn't find any NPI docs and I haven't got so much time to dig
> all the way through NPI code to find out. If so then it would be rational to
> create some sort of a "provider cache" because enumeration of all the
> instances stored in the CIMOM for every getInstance operation can be pretty
> expensive (in regard both to CPU and to network utilization).
> 

Regards,
	Viktor