|
From: Heidi N. <HEI...@de...> - 2001-11-08 08:18:27
|
Arvin , first thanks for calling my attention to this fact . I strongly agree to the paragraph you copied from the spec 2.2 . The only acceptable way to get around this issue is becoming in conformity with the spec . It is a inexcusable mistake of mine and it is my duty to fix it . In this first schema version I did not seperate the implemen- tation from the schema as clear as I should have done . To fasten the coding progress I used the enumeration returning ObjectPathes . The additional properties I declared as key are the ones I need to create the association instances between the classes . The code will be fixed and in the CVS by next monday (11/12) . thanks ... heidi Mfg / Regards Heidi Neumann Linux Technology Center - Systems Management - IBM Laboratory Boeblingen - Germany - Schönaicher Str. 220 - 71032 - Böblingen Phone : ++49 (0) 7031 / 16 - 3193 hei...@de... http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/projects/sblim/ |