Re: [Sblim-devel] regarding profile registration profile

[David H. <hel...@us...>]

Hi George,

At first I thought you were asking about CIM_RegisteredProfile 
specifically.  But now I see, your question is a general one?  You are 
expecting to get the base class as a result of an ei query instead of the 
subclass?

If your provider (defines and) creates a subclass, the subclass is the 
correct response for the ei, ein, gi, etc.

If you are trying to get your provider to create instances of the base 
class directly... I'm not sure if that can be done in a 
standards-compliant way.  I can't think of any examples where that is 
done.  Perhaps other folks on the mailing list have.

Is there a reason you would like to create instances of the base class 
directly instead of a subclass?  As long as you get all the instances of 
the subclass when you query an ei, etc. on the base class -- which should 
always be the case -- does it matter?

Dave

David E. Heller
IBM Linux Technology Center
hel...@us...




George varghese <geo...@gm...> 
12/16/2013 02:23 AM

To
David Heller/Allentown/IBM@IBMUS, 
cc

Subject
Re: [Sblim-devel] regarding profile registration profile






Hi,

When you get free time, please reply. I am waiting for your response.

Regards,
George


On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 6:31 PM, George varghese <geo...@gm...> 
wrote:
Hi,

I have one question,

Please see the mof file for CIM_SoftwareIdentity.

class GK_SoftwareIdentity : CIM_SoftwareIdentity
{
};

I expecting a GC or a EI operation on this class to return the base class 
CIM_SoftwareIdentity instead of GK_SoftwareIdentity?

Here ,I have filled some properties values in provider by progrmatically. 
So, I can't declare a static class for this.

Is it possible?

Please advise me.

Regards,
George


On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:50 PM, George varghese <geo...@gm...> 
wrote:
Dear David,

Thank you. It's very helpful for me. 

Hi George, 
Sorry for the delay.  Apologies also that I may not be understanding your 
question: 

You have registered a new class "GK_RegProfile" but you are expecting a GC 
or a EI operation on this class to return the base class 
CIM_RegisteredProfile instead of GK_RegProfile? 
    yes. That's my requirement. 
 I think returning the result of GK_RegProfile is expected here.
  Ok. 

Or perhaps your intent is create instances of the base 
CIM_RegisteredProfile class directly?  There is a test XML in SFCB xmltest 
directory that will do this, for example: see 
"zcreateInstance_RegProfile.xml".  Also you can create static instances of 
CIM_RegisteredProfile by defining them in a MOF file.  For example, you 
can force one the default instances of SFCB_RegisteredProfile to appear 
instead as instance of CIM_RegisteredProfile by making an edit like this 
to the mof file, then running "make postinstall" to recompile the mof: 
$ vi /var/lib/sfcb/stage/mofs/root/interop/10_interop.mof 
 ... 
 class SFCB_RegisteredProfile : CIM_RegisteredProfile 
  { 
  }; 
-instance of SFCB_RegisteredProfile 
+instance of CIM_RegisteredProfile 
 { 
   InstanceID = "CIM:SFCB_PR"; 
   RegisteredOrganization = 2; 
   RegisteredName = "Profile Registration"; 
   RegisteredVersion = "1.0.0"; 
   AdvertiseTypes = 3; 
 }; 
yes. I have removed the class for this and added above mentioned (instance 
of CIM_RegisteredProfile) things to mof file. then run sfcprepos -f .. and 
try to enumerate class, CIM_RegisteredProfile.  It's working. Thank you.. 
Thank you very much.

You wish your provider to do this?  To create instances of the base class 
CIM_RegisteredProfile rather than some subclass? 

Yes. I think that for implementing profile registration profile, no need 
to create subclass & implementation in c file. But I have one doubt.  I 
wish to change the existing implementation of 
CIM_SoftwareInstallationService class instance like this. But in that 
case, I want to implement InstallFromURI method also?.. In that case is it 
possible? .. how?


Please advise me..

Regards,
George


On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:27 AM, David Heller <hel...@us...> wrote:
Hi George, 

Sorry for the delay.  Apologies also that I may not be understanding your 
question: 

You have registered a new class "GK_RegProfile" but you are expecting a GC 
or a EI operation on this class to return the base class 
CIM_RegisteredProfile instead of GK_RegProfile?  I think returning the 
result of GK_RegProfile is expected here. 

Or perhaps your intent is create instances of the base 
CIM_RegisteredProfile class directly?  There is a test XML in SFCB xmltest 
directory that will do this, for example: see 
"zcreateInstance_RegProfile.xml".  Also you can create static instances of 
CIM_RegisteredProfile by defining them in a MOF file.  For example, you 
can force one the default instances of SFCB_RegisteredProfile to appear 
instead as instance of CIM_RegisteredProfile by making an edit like this 
to the mof file, then running "make postinstall" to recompile the mof: 

$ vi /var/lib/sfcb/stage/mofs/root/interop/10_interop.mof 
 ... 
 class SFCB_RegisteredProfile : CIM_RegisteredProfile 
  { 
  }; 

-instance of SFCB_RegisteredProfile 
+instance of CIM_RegisteredProfile 
 { 
   InstanceID = "CIM:SFCB_PR"; 
   RegisteredOrganization = 2; 
   RegisteredName = "Profile Registration"; 
   RegisteredVersion = "1.0.0"; 
   AdvertiseTypes = 3; 
 }; 

You wish your provider to do this?  To create instances of the base class 
CIM_RegisteredProfile rather than some subclass? 

Thanks, 
Dave 


David E. Heller
IBM Linux Technology Center
hel...@us...




George varghese <geo...@gm...> 
11/13/2013 05:08 AM 


To
sbl...@li..., 
cc

Subject
Re: [Sblim-devel] regarding profile registration profile








Hi, 

Anybody please reply to me, I am waiting for your response? 

Regards, 
George 


On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:27 PM, George varghese <geo...@gm...> 
wrote: 
Hi, 

I had implemented a provider for profile registration using 
sblim-development packages. I have some doubts regarding it , For 
implementing it, I have been created a mof file, please see the content of 
the mof file, 

class GK_RegProfile : CIM_RegisteredProfile 
{ 
}; 

After implementation, testing, I got the following response, 
<n1:GK_RegProfile>
                        <n1:Caption xsi:nil="true"/>
                        <n1:Description xsi:nil="true"/>
                        <n1:ElementName xsi:nil="true"/>
                        <n1:Generation xsi:nil="true"/>
                        <n1:InstanceID>Base</n1:InstanceID>
                        
<n1:OtherRegisteredOrganization>***</n1:OtherRegisteredOrganization>
                        <n1:OtherSpecificationType xsi:nil="true"/>
                        <n1:RegisteredName>***</n1:RegisteredName>
                        
<n1:RegisteredOrganization>*</n1:RegisteredOrganization>
                        <n1:RegisteredVersion>**</n1:RegisteredVersion>
                        <n1:SpecificationType xsi:nil="true"/>
                    </n1::GK_RegProfile>

But I expected following response,

<n1:CIM_RegisteredProfile>
                        <n1:Caption xsi:nil="true"/>
                        <n1:Description xsi:nil="true"/>
                        <n1:ElementName xsi:nil="true"/>
                        <n1:Generation xsi:nil="true"/>
                        <n1:InstanceID>base</n1:InstanceID>
                        
<n1:OtherRegisteredOrganization>***</n1:OtherRegisteredOrganization>
                        <n1:OtherSpecificationType xsi:nil="true"/>
                        <n1:RegisteredName>***</n1:RegisteredName>
                        
<n1:RegisteredOrganization>*</n1:RegisteredOrganization>
                        <n1:RegisteredVersion>**</n1:RegisteredVersion>
                        <n1:SpecificationType xsi:nil="true"/>
                    </n1:CIM_RegisteredProfile> 

For getting this kind of response, what can I do, or above response is 
correct?. 

For implementing this profile, is it need a new class for this?  
 Can't we use CIM_RegisteredProfile itself?.. if it posible how? 

Please help me. 

Regards, 
George 








On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Tyrel Datwyler <
ty...@li...> wrote: 
On 07/16/2013 08:05 AM, George varghese wrote:
>
> I want to register these profile as per the standard of profile
> registration profile. How to achieve it using sfcb. How to create
> instances of CIM classes.. which classes they are.
>

The sblim-gather package implements the DMTF's DSP1053 Base Metric
Profile. You could look at its provider implementation for a reference.

-Tyrel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps
OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access
Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server.
Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Sblim-devel mailing list
Sbl...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sblim-devel