From: Christophe R. <cs...@ca...> - 2010-06-24 07:55:51
|
Hi, Wow, it's late in the month. Where does all the time go? Anyway, it's time to please concentrate on testing rather than exciting new features; given in particular the exciting upgrade to a modern ASDF, people should please exercise any odd codepaths that their systems might tickle. If all goes well, I anticipate releasing early next week. Cheers, Christophe |
From: Stas B. <sta...@gm...> - 2010-06-25 08:13:56
|
Christophe Rhodes <cs...@ca...> writes: > Hi, > > Wow, it's late in the month. Where does all the time go? Anyway, it's > time to please concentrate on testing rather than exciting new features; > given in particular the exciting upgrade to a modern ASDF, people should > please exercise any odd codepaths that their systems might tickle. If > all goes well, I anticipate releasing early next week. > I'd like to see this fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/598374 go into the current release. -- With Best Regards, Stas. |
From: Roman M. <rom...@gm...> - 2010-06-25 08:31:20
|
Also, there are several small patches from me in Launchpad. I would like to see them committed. Alternatively, please tell me what is wrong with them. https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/571581 https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/576594 https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/573747 https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/586940 Regards, Roman 2010/6/25 Stas Boukarev <sta...@gm...> > Christophe Rhodes <cs...@ca...> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > Wow, it's late in the month. Where does all the time go? Anyway, it's > > time to please concentrate on testing rather than exciting new features; > > given in particular the exciting upgrade to a modern ASDF, people should > > please exercise any odd codepaths that their systems might tickle. If > > all goes well, I anticipate releasing early next week. > > > I'd like to see this fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/598374 go > into the current release. > > -- > With Best Regards, Stas. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > _______________________________________________ > Sbcl-devel mailing list > Sbc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel > |
From: Christophe R. <cs...@ca...> - 2010-06-27 17:13:35
|
Christophe Rhodes <cs...@ca...> writes: > Wow, it's late in the month. Where does all the time go? Anyway, it's > time to please concentrate on testing rather than exciting new features; > given in particular the exciting upgrade to a modern ASDF, people should > please exercise any odd codepaths that their systems might tickle. If > all goes well, I anticipate releasing early next week. As I understand it, things are not all going well. In particular, though some of the wrinkles have been ironed out, I believe that there are regressions in run-sbcl.sh. Is that the case? Is anyone planning to fix them, or should I simply revert asdf back to the old version? Cheers, Christophe |
From: Alastair B. <ala...@gm...> - 2010-06-27 19:44:58
|
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Christophe Rhodes <cs...@ca...> wrote: > Christophe Rhodes <cs...@ca...> writes: > >> Wow, it's late in the month. Where does all the time go? Anyway, it's >> time to please concentrate on testing rather than exciting new features; >> given in particular the exciting upgrade to a modern ASDF, people should >> please exercise any odd codepaths that their systems might tickle. If >> all goes well, I anticipate releasing early next week. > > As I understand it, things are not all going well. In particular, > though some of the wrinkles have been ironed out, I believe that there > are regressions in run-sbcl.sh. Is that the case? Is anyone planning > to fix them, or should I simply revert asdf back to the old version? Apparently, everybody thought someone else was doing it. I just committed the known minimal fix for run-sbcl.sh, which clears up the only problems I have run into this freeze. Removing the help message is, so far as I'm concerned, out of scope for a freeze period. Are we good now, or are there any other issues? > Cheers, > > Christophe -- Alastair Bridgewater |
From: Christophe R. <cs...@ca...> - 2010-06-28 13:51:36
|
Alastair Bridgewater <ala...@gm...> writes: > Apparently, everybody thought someone else was doing it. I just > committed the known minimal fix for run-sbcl.sh, which clears up the > only problems I have run into this freeze. Removing the help message > is, so far as I'm concerned, out of scope for a freeze period. Thanks. > Are we good now, or are there any other issues? I hear silence... I hope that's a good thing. :-) Cheers, Christophe |
From: Teemu L. <tli...@ik...> - 2010-06-28 14:42:35
|
* 2010-06-28 14:42 (+0100), Christophe Rhodes wrote: > Alastair Bridgewater <ala...@gm...> writes: >> Are we good now, or are there any other issues? > I hear silence... I hope that's a good thing. :-) Well, let me say that I just love ASDF2 and the new ways of configuring system locations and .fasl file locations. I don't know if this mailing list reaches the right people but I think ASDF developers deserve a big thank you. |
From: Martin C. <cra...@co...> - 2010-06-28 16:57:39
|
Teemu Likonen wrote on Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:42:00PM +0300: > * 2010-06-28 14:42 (+0100), Christophe Rhodes wrote: > > > Alastair Bridgewater <ala...@gm...> writes: > >> Are we good now, or are there any other issues? > > > I hear silence... I hope that's a good thing. :-) > > Well, let me say that I just love ASDF2 and the new ways of configuring > system locations and .fasl file locations. I don't know if this mailing > list reaches the right people but I think ASDF developers deserve a big > thank you. Did our ASDF people agree on whether 2.002 or 2.102 should be in? I recommend that we do not have any SBCL release with an ASDF release higher than what we might downgrade to when minds are made up. Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer <cra...@co...> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/ |
From: Stelian I. <sio...@cd...> - 2010-06-28 17:21:15
|
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 12:57 -0400, Martin Cracauer wrote: > Teemu Likonen wrote on Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:42:00PM +0300: > > * 2010-06-28 14:42 (+0100), Christophe Rhodes wrote: > > > > > Alastair Bridgewater <ala...@gm...> writes: > > >> Are we good now, or are there any other issues? > > > > > I hear silence... I hope that's a good thing. :-) > > > > Well, let me say that I just love ASDF2 and the new ways of configuring > > system locations and .fasl file locations. I don't know if this mailing > > list reaches the right people but I think ASDF developers deserve a big > > thank you. > > Did our ASDF people agree on whether 2.002 or 2.102 should be in ? Faré said 2.003(a few days ago in a discussion on #lisp) -- Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib |
From: Martin C. <cra...@co...> - 2010-06-28 17:33:22
|
Stelian Ionescu wrote on Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 01:03:26AM +0800: > On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 12:57 -0400, Martin Cracauer wrote: > > Teemu Likonen wrote on Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:42:00PM +0300: > > > * 2010-06-28 14:42 (+0100), Christophe Rhodes wrote: > > > > > > > Alastair Bridgewater <ala...@gm...> writes: > > > >> Are we good now, or are there any other issues? > > > > > > > I hear silence... I hope that's a good thing. :-) > > > > > > Well, let me say that I just love ASDF2 and the new ways of configuring > > > system locations and .fasl file locations. I don't know if this mailing > > > list reaches the right people but I think ASDF developers deserve a big > > > thank you. > > > > Did our ASDF people agree on whether 2.002 or 2.102 should be in ? > > Far?? said 2.003(a few days ago in a discussion on #lisp) I feel strongly that the new SBCL release should not have 2.1xx then. Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer <cra...@co...> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/ |
From: Faré <fa...@gm...> - 2010-06-28 18:03:37
Attachments:
sbcl--asdf.diff
|
>>>: Martin >>> Did our ASDF people agree on whether 2.002 or 2.102 should be in ? >>: Stelian >> Faré said 2.003 (a few days ago in a discussion on #lisp) >: Martin > I feel strongly that the new SBCL release should not have 2.1xx then. Indeed, and now it doesn't: slyrus upgraded SBCL's ASDF to 2.003, which is functionally the same as 2.105, but blessed as a release in the 2.0xx branch. 2.1xx is for development, and in the future, SBCL should probably stick to the release branch. Attached is a patch so that "make up" will do the right thing in the future (that might be committed to 1.0.40.smallint). [ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] Success is getting what you want. Happiness is wanting what you get. — Dale Carnegie |