From: Robert G. <rpg...@si...> - 2010-02-26 23:44:03
|
Trying to build a 64-bit, threaded SBCL bootstrapping from a threaded 32-bit SBCL, I get the following error. SBCL specifically says that it should be reported as a bug, so.... //doing warm init - compilation phase This is SBCL 1.0.35.18, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp. More information about SBCL is available at <http://www.sbcl.org/>. SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty. It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the distribution for more information. debugger invoked on a TYPE-ERROR in thread #S(SB!THREAD:THREAD :NAME initial thread :%ALIVE-P T :OS-THREAD 140735073244928 :INTERRUPTIONS NIL :INTERRUPTIONS-LOCK #S(SB!THREAD:MUTEX :NAME thread interruptions lock :%OWNER NIL :LUTEX #< unknown pointer object, widetag=#x66 {1002AA601F}>) :RESULT NIL :RESULT-LOCK #S(SB!THREAD:MUTEX :NAME thread result lock :%OWNER NIL :LUTEX #< unknown pointer object, widetag=#x66 {1002AA608F}>)): #S(TYPE-ERROR :ACTUAL-INITARGS (DATUM 1709264 EXPECTED-TYPE (MOD 1000001)) :ASSIGNED-SLOTS NIL) Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:QUIT) to exit from SBCL. (no restarts: If you didn't do this on purpose, please report it as a bug.) (GET-INTERNAL-RUN-TIME) 0] WARNING: #S(SIMPLE-WARNING :ACTUAL-INITARGS (FORMAT-CONTROL Starting a select without a timeout while interrupts are ~ disabled. FORMAT-ARGUMENTS NIL) :ASSIGNED-SLOTS NIL) |
From: Nikodemus S. <nik...@ra...> - 2010-02-27 09:24:21
|
On 27 February 2010 01:43, Robert Goldman <rpg...@si...> wrote: > Trying to build a 64-bit, threaded SBCL bootstrapping from a threaded > 32-bit SBCL, I get the following error. SBCL specifically says that it > should be reported as a bug, so.... Thanks for letting us know. Did you run clean.sh before running make.sh? (I *think* I've seen this, and it has been a symptom of bits and piece of a 32-bit build messing up a 64-bit build or vice versa.) Cheers, -- Nikodemus |
From: Robert G. <rpg...@si...> - 2010-02-27 22:03:45
|
On 2/27/10 Feb 27 -3:24 AM, Nikodemus Siivola wrote: > On 27 February 2010 01:43, Robert Goldman <rpg...@si...> wrote: >> Trying to build a 64-bit, threaded SBCL bootstrapping from a threaded >> 32-bit SBCL, I get the following error. SBCL specifically says that it >> should be reported as a bug, so.... > > Thanks for letting us know. > > Did you run clean.sh before running make.sh? (I *think* I've seen > this, and it has been a symptom of bits and piece of a 32-bit build > messing up a 64-bit build or vice versa.) <blush> No, I didn't. </blush> Sorry about that. Best, r |