From: William Harold Newman <william.newman@ai...> - 2001-12-30 23:31:12
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 07:46:13PM +0000, Daniel Barlow wrote:
> I tried building current CVS (0.pre7.106) yesterday on Alpha. It
> mostly works; there are a couple of typos, one change I don't
> understand the necessity for but believe should be harmless, and some
> missing header files to get a LDB-enabled build.
> The question: where does/should SUBNAMES_WIDETAG come from? I renamed
> the references in print.c back to subtype_Names as was, which still
> exists and works.
It looks like a case of bleary-eyed global search-and-replace leading
to garbled nonsense. Then, since I haven't been using or even building
with ldb, and all the uses of the screwed-up names seem to be
conditionalized on defined(LISP_FEATURE_SB_LDB), I didn't notice the
As an immediate fix, I'll apply the patch. For the future, I'll try to
be more careful to test code that I edit, and more careful when
editing code that I can't test.
William Harold Newman <william.newman@...>
HAPPY HACKING TO ALL, AND I'LL BE BACK NEXT YEAR!
PGP key fingerprint 85 CE 1C BA 79 8D 51 8C B9 25 FB EE E0 C3 E5 7C
Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.