From: William Harold Newman <wnewman@us...> - 2002-06-13 00:47:54
Update of /cvsroot/sbcl/sbcl
In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv29173
merged patch: APD ANSI compliance bugfix for DECLARE IGNORABLE
of special variable (sbcl-devel 2002-06-12)
Whether or not my alternative fix for the CALL-NEXT-METHOD
type warning bug (being carefully reviewed on
sbcl-devel even as I write:-) is OK, I might as well
at least stuff the exploratory test cases I wrote
for it into tests/.
Bug 137 (useless debug names e.g. in BACKTRACE) seems to be
gone, since at least I haven't stumbled across it
recently, so delete the BUGS entry.
RCS file: /cvsroot/sbcl/sbcl/BUGS,v
retrieving revision 1.152
retrieving revision 1.153
diff -u -d -r1.152 -r1.153
--- BUGS 12 Jun 2002 11:51:55 -0000 1.152
+++ BUGS 13 Jun 2002 00:47:51 -0000 1.153
@@ -972,18 +972,6 @@
(let ((x (1+ x)))
Now (FOO 3) should return 3, but instead it returns 4.
- (SB-DEBUG:BACKTRACE) output should start with something
- including the name BACKTRACE, not (as in 0.pre7.88)
- just "0: (\"hairy arg processor\" ...)". Until about
- sbcl-0.pre7.109, the names in BACKTRACE were all screwed
- up compared to the nice useful names in sbcl-0.6.13.
- Around sbcl-0.pre7.109, they were mostly fixed by using
- NAMED-LAMBDA to implement DEFUN. However, there are still
- some screwups left, e.g. as of sbcl-0.pre7.109, there are
- still some functions named "hairy arg processor" and
- "SB-INT:&MORE processor".
Pretty-printing nested backquotes doesn't work right, as
RCS file: /cvsroot/sbcl/sbcl/version.lisp-expr,v
retrieving revision 1.446
retrieving revision 1.447
diff -u -d -r1.446 -r1.447
--- version.lisp-expr 12 Jun 2002 11:51:55 -0000 1.446
+++ version.lisp-expr 13 Jun 2002 00:47:51 -0000 1.447
@@ -18,4 +18,4 @@
;;; for internal versions, especially for internal versions off the
;;; main CVS branch, it gets hairier, e.g. "0.pre7.14.flaky4.13".)
Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.