From: Alastair B. <ala...@gm...> - 2013-05-26 17:14:56
|
Hello Paul, We've historically had different test results on FreeBSD/x86-64 between threaded and non-threaded builds, with the threaded builds coming out the poorer. A couple of my commits in this release are supposed to address the worst of this difference, so I'm curious, are these threaded or non-threaded builds? Or do both versions have the same results on both platforms? Thanks, -- Alastair Bridgewater On May 25, 2013 8:05 PM, "Paul Khuong" <pv...@pv...> wrote: > > x86-64: > Expected failure: compiler.pure.lisp / > FOLD-INDEX-ADDRESSING-POSITIVE-OFFSET > Expected failure: interface.pure.lisp / (SLEEP NON-CONSING) > Expected failure: dynamic-extent.impure.lisp / (NO-CONSING > SPECIALIZED-DX-VECTORS) > Expected failure: packages.impure.lisp / USE-PACKAGE-CONFLICT-SET > Expected failure: packages.impure.lisp / IMPORT-SINGLE-CONFLICT > Expected failure: walk.impure.lisp / (WALK-LET* HAIRY-SPECIALS) > Expected failure: walk.impure.lisp / (WALK-LET* HAIRY-SPECIALS) > > x86: > Expected failure: compiler.pure.lisp / > FOLD-INDEX-ADDRESSING-POSITIVE-OFFSET > Unexpected success: debug.impure.lisp / (UNDEFINED-FUNCTION BUG-346) > Failure: debug.impure.lisp / > BACKTRACE-INTERRUPTED-CONDITION-WAIT > Expected failure: packages.impure.lisp / USE-PACKAGE-CONFLICT-SET > Expected failure: packages.impure.lisp / IMPORT-SINGLE-CONFLICT > Expected failure: walk.impure.lisp / (WALK-LET* HAIRY-SPECIALS) > Expected failure: walk.impure.lisp / (WALK-LET* HAIRY-SPECIALS) > > Paul Khuong > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt > New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service > that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your > browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic > and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may > _______________________________________________ > Sbcl-devel mailing list > Sbc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel |