Re: [Sbcl-devel] what 1.0.29 to package for debian?

[Peter V. E. <pva...@de...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hello all,

Nikodemus Siivola wrote:
> 1.0.29.11 would be my suggestion: since it has all the DIRECTORY
> regressions we know about fixed. If you want to play it
> conservatibely, reverting 1.0.29.9, 1.0.29.4, 1.0.29.3, and 1.0.29.2
> from it make it a purely bugfix snapshot on top of .28 -- but I don't
> consider any of those patches to be "risky".

Ok as you might have seen I packages 1.0.29.11 and uploaded it.

Thanks for the help and your work on this great compiler!

Groetjes, Peter

- --
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org
http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/
"God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave
Aronson|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=Cx9J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----