From: Nikodemus S. <de...@us...> - 2008-02-17 13:26:21
|
Update of /cvsroot/sbcl/sbcl In directory sc8-pr-cvs8.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv3825 Modified Files: BUGS version.lisp-expr Log Message: 1.0.14.32: fix bug 407 * %SINGLE-FLOAT and %DOUBLE-FLOAT should not be flushable. * BUGS entry remains: should (COERCE (EXPT 2 1024) 'SINGLE-FLOAT) really signal a TYPE-ERROR? Index: BUGS =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/sbcl/sbcl/BUGS,v retrieving revision 1.529 retrieving revision 1.530 diff -u -d -r1.529 -r1.530 --- BUGS 21 Jan 2008 14:40:54 -0000 1.529 +++ BUGS 17 Feb 2008 13:26:15 -0000 1.530 @@ -1713,6 +1713,10 @@ 3: (SB-C::BOUND-FUNC ...) 4: (SB-C::%SINGLE-FLOAT-DERIVE-TYPE-AUX ...) + These are now fixed, but (COERCE HUGE 'SINGLE-FLOAT) still signals a + type-error at runtime. The question is, should it instead signal a + floating-point overflow, or return an infinity? + 408: SUBTYPEP confusion re. OR of SATISFIES of not-yet-defined predicate As reported by Levente M\'{e}sz\'{a}ros sbcl-devel 2006-02-20, (aver (equal (multiple-value-list Index: version.lisp-expr =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/sbcl/sbcl/version.lisp-expr,v retrieving revision 1.3860 retrieving revision 1.3861 diff -u -d -r1.3860 -r1.3861 --- version.lisp-expr 17 Feb 2008 08:18:40 -0000 1.3860 +++ version.lisp-expr 17 Feb 2008 13:26:15 -0000 1.3861 @@ -17,4 +17,4 @@ ;;; checkins which aren't released. (And occasionally for internal ;;; versions, especially for internal versions off the main CVS ;;; branch, it gets hairier, e.g. "0.pre7.14.flaky4.13".) -"1.0.14.31" +"1.0.14.32" |