Re: [Sbcl-devel] (no subject)

[Nikodemus S. <tsi...@cc...>]

On Fri, 28 May 2004, Brian Mastenbrook wrote:

> In followup to earlier discussion of SBCL / Darwin building, the attached
> patch should make everything OK by backing the optimization off to O2 (not
> O3). It also cleans up the linker flags, many of which were extraneous.

Thank you, this has been merged in 0.8.10.65.

Cheers,

 -- Nikodemus                   "Not as clumsy or random as a C++ or Java.
                             An elegant weapon for a more civilized time."