oh, it's just extra instructions getting inserted causing my heuristic "too much assembly code getting generated" condition to fail.
I guess disabling the test for sb-safepoint is ok?

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Jan Moringen <jmoringe@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
On Sat, 2014-05-17 at 21:25 -0400, Douglas Katzman wrote:
> ok, fixed now.

On x86 and x86_64 with feature set sb-safepoint, sb-thruption,
sb-wtimer, there is an UNEXPECTED-FAILURE :ARRAY-SUBTYPE-TESTS for the


case [1,2].

Kind regards,

[1] https://ci.cor-lab.org/job/sbcl-master/461/featureset=5,label=ubuntu_trusty_32bit/consoleFull
[2] https://ci.cor-lab.org/job/sbcl-master/461/featureset=5,label=ubuntu_trusty_64bit/consoleFull