On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Juho Snellman <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Elliott Slaughter <email@example.com> wrote:On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:31 PM, David Lichteblau <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Quite possibly. I could write such a patch for that later today if you think that's a better idea than my current patch.Hi,
shouldn't it test whether the gcc in PATH is a cygwin gcc, rather than
Quoting Elliott Slaughter (email@example.com):
> Could you please take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/777339 ?
> I can't build on MinGW without this patch.
just whether uname indicates cygwin?That would be a nicer approach. If you have time to do it, that'd be great. If not, I can apply the existing patch.