Thanks for the note.  I also had the same question.

Thanks for all of your work on SBCL and I hope being busy at work is 'good busy'!




----- Message d'origine -----
De: Christophe Rhodes <csr21@cantab.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:59:09 +0000
Sujet: [Sbcl-devel] current sbcl maintenance sluggishness (was Re: Timed Condition Variable/Semaphore Waiting)
: "David L. Rager" <ragerdl@cs.utexas.edu>
Cc: sbcl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
"David L. Rager" writes:

> Is there something I can change about this timed-waiting patch so that
> it gains acceptance into the repository?

Speaking for myself: my time at work and home is highly constrained, and
probably will continue to be until April or May, and I can't spare the
time to do a thorough job of reviewing work like this. My guess is that
the same applies to many; it's one of the perils of a volunteer
workforce. That is to say, don't take a lack of response as an active
rejection; it is an unfortunate thing that at the moment there are not
as many active resources to spend on SBCL maintenance and development as
there once were (and hopefully there will be again).



Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference
attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through
interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies.
Sbcl-devel mailing list