Re: [Sax-devel] startPrefixMapping with redundant namespace declarations
Brought to you by:
dmegginson
From: Rob L. <ro...@el...> - 2002-09-18 13:42:54
|
Karl Waclawek wrote: > > I would say: As long as the spec doesn't treat redundant NS > declarations differently, then neither should the implementation. > Fair point. But we took the startPrefixMapping event to mean that a *new*prefix mapping was coming into effect. I think this is best thought of as a logical rather than a lexical event, and therefore the redundant declaration is a non event. However, we don't wish to go out on a limb. If the consensus is that redundant declarations should be reported, then we can simply make the useful ElCel behaviour controllable via an option. ~Rob |