From: Alexander <tru...@gm...> - 2011-05-24 15:01:45
|
Hello, i've noticed that liquidsoap requires many cpu resources while streaming mp3. I understand, that reencoding of music file is not cheap... but i can do it before streaming & making playlists. Is it possible somehow run liquidsoap without reencoding? Another problem that puts me in trouble is to make 2 or 3 streams in different bitrate without reencoding, but with the same playlist. Of course, i can prepare 2 copies of file in different bitrates.. but is it possible to run liquidsoap without reencoding & synchronize 2 daemons? I believe that liquisoap can do everything :) -- Kind regards, Alexander. |
From: Brandon C. <bra...@gm...> - 2011-05-24 15:49:07
|
I'm not certain, but maybe you can configure liquidsoap to use an external encoder, but it won't do any encoding. It just echo back all the data. I think the drawback for this method might be so support for multiple streams. Sent from my iPhone On May 24, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Alexander <tru...@gm...> wrote: > Hello, > i've noticed that liquidsoap requires many cpu resources while streaming mp3. I understand, that reencoding of music file is not cheap... but i can do it before streaming & making playlists. > Is it possible somehow run liquidsoap without reencoding? > > Another problem that puts me in trouble is to make 2 or 3 streams in different bitrate without reencoding, but with the same playlist. Of course, i can prepare 2 copies of file in different bitrates.. but is it possible to run liquidsoap without reencoding & synchronize 2 daemons? > > I believe that liquisoap can do everything :) > > -- > Kind regards, > Alexander. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. > With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, > you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. > Download your free trial now. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 > _______________________________________________ > Savonet-users mailing list > Sav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users |
From: Samuel M. <sm...@gm...> - 2011-05-24 19:14:12
|
Hi, Unfortunately, it is not currently possible to stream data without reencoding. We are looking into this but it will certainly be after 1.0... ++ Sam. On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Brandon Casci <bra...@gm...> wrote: > > I'm not certain, but maybe you can configure liquidsoap to use an external encoder, but it won't do any encoding. It just echo back all the data. I think the drawback for this method might be so support for multiple streams. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 24, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Alexander <tru...@gm...> wrote: > >> Hello, >> i've noticed that liquidsoap requires many cpu resources while streaming mp3. I understand, that reencoding of music file is not cheap... but i can do it before streaming & making playlists. >> Is it possible somehow run liquidsoap without reencoding? >> >> Another problem that puts me in trouble is to make 2 or 3 streams in different bitrate without reencoding, but with the same playlist. Of course, i can prepare 2 copies of file in different bitrates.. but is it possible to run liquidsoap without reencoding & synchronize 2 daemons? >> >> I believe that liquisoap can do everything :) >> >> -- >> Kind regards, >> Alexander. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. >> With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, >> you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. >> Download your free trial now. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 >> _______________________________________________ >> Savonet-users mailing list >> Sav...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. > With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, > you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. > Download your free trial now. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 > _______________________________________________ > Savonet-users mailing list > Sav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users > |
From: Gilles P. <con...@gi...> - 2011-05-24 19:36:59
|
Le 24/05/2011 21:13, Samuel Mimram a écrit : > Hi, > > Unfortunately, it is not currently possible to stream data without > reencoding. We are looking into this but it will certainly be after > 1.0... > This. would. be. awesome. Great automation & toolkit from liquidsoap, but without the need to re-encode, that would be great.. I have no idea how hard it can be on the code site, but I look forward to playing with it ;) Cheers, Gilou > ++ > > Sam. > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Brandon > Casci<bra...@gm...> wrote: >> >> I'm not certain, but maybe you can configure liquidsoap to use an >> external encoder, but it won't do any encoding. It just echo back >> all the data. I think the drawback for this method might be so >> support for multiple streams. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On May 24, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Alexander<tru...@gm...> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello, i've noticed that liquidsoap requires many cpu resources >>> while streaming mp3. I understand, that reencoding of music file >>> is not cheap... but i can do it before streaming& making >>> playlists. Is it possible somehow run liquidsoap without >>> reencoding? >>> >>> Another problem that puts me in trouble is to make 2 or 3 streams >>> in different bitrate without reencoding, but with the same >>> playlist. Of course, i can prepare 2 copies of file in different >>> bitrates.. but is it possible to run liquidsoap without >>> reencoding& synchronize 2 daemons? >>> >>> I believe that liquisoap can do everything :) >>> >>> -- Kind regards, Alexander. |
From: Romain B. <to...@ra...> - 2011-05-24 19:41:35
|
2011/5/24 Gilles PIETRI <con...@gi...>: > Le 24/05/2011 21:13, Samuel Mimram a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> Unfortunately, it is not currently possible to stream data without >> reencoding. We are looking into this but it will certainly be after >> 1.0... >> > > This. would. be. awesome. > > Great automation & toolkit from liquidsoap, but without the need to > re-encode, that would be great.. I have no idea how hard it can be on > the code site, but I look forward to playing with it ;) Well, let me state it clear: * One of the most exciting challenge for me as a developer * One of the most frightening challenge for me as a developer I personally do not believe that this is so much relevant for audio media: transcoding is cheap when you have a handful of streams and quality loss is not really a problem -- or you can use FLAC and WAV nowadays. However, for video streams, it would be priceless.. We are definitely thinking about it but I would hold your horses on that for a little while :) Romain |