|
From: Andrew R. <an...@ra...> - 2003-07-30 04:43:46
|
Hi, Thanks for the offer. I'm not doing any of the work on the C++ version except providing information on how things are working for me on the Perl version. Unfortunately I'm not a programmer :-(. I will forward your offer to Dylan who is doing this work though. (about time he let the rest of us see some of his code anyway :-). So to your original questions: firewall changes will NOT be required for outgoing calls so long as any outgoing traffic from the SaRP server is allowed. Incoming calls will require the SIP port (5060 by default) to be accessible on the SaRP server. If the SaRP server has a real world IP then this just means allowing that traffic through or if it uses a private IP then forwarding anything on port 5060 to it. As for the RTP traffic this should be fine so long as any traffic from the server is allowed out or otherwise follow the same procedure for the ports listed in your config file as for port 5060. As for IPFreedom, I am not familiar with them so I can't comment. Could you provide more information? And lastly, as far as communication is concerned the best place to get in touch would probably be simply using the SaRP mailing lists. I'll have to add links to them directly on the homepage, but for now use the Sourceforge pages. (email me directly if you have problems) Regards, Andrew Radke On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:06:58PM +0200, Szabolcs Szasz wrote: > Oops, I forgot to tell, that there is some fair chance I could > contribute to the C++ version sometime in the near future. > > BTW, do you happen to know of any commercial alternatives > to IPFreedom? > > Cheers, > Sz. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Szabolcs Szasz" <sz...@sz...> > To: <an...@ra...> > Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 1:59 PM > Subject: Fw: SIP NAT traversal > > > > Just in case, I forward this to your other mail address > > (found in the SARP copyright notice). > > > > Later, > > Sz. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Szabolcs Szasz" <sz...@sz...> > > To: <ar...@us...> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 1:56 PM > > Subject: SIP NAT traversal > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Just found your project! Very cool that someone really > > > started doing it. In fact, I also found myself in a situation > > > just now, where I need some solution to this problem. > > > > > > As I understand, your stuff requires firewall reconfiguration > > > (however minimal). Is that indeed the case? > > > > > > I'm investigating a solution that is more like the IPFreedom > > > client-server model. How close/far is your architecture > > > to/from theirs? > > > > > > (What would be the preferred way of keeping contact? > > > Is this your mail address OK for this purpose?) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Szabolcs > > > > > > |