From: Rob H. <ro...@ro...> - 2003-04-23 17:12:22
|
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 12:04:50PM -0500, Bart Metzger wrote: > Rob > > The checkout works, it is when you try and access the module on the > sandbox page that it hangs. That may explain the timeout, as it hangs > indefinitely. Oh, ok. Sorry, I misread that part. If you do a "ps -awwwux | grep sandweb-expect" do you see a really long command running ( sets some variables, calls cvs, etc )? Probably not since Shell is failing. What is it that's hanging? Is the browser sitting there trying to reload the page? Thanks, Rob > > Luck > Bart > > On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 12:04, Rob Helmer wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:21:44AM -0500, Bart Metzger wrote: > > > Sorry, long day > > > > :) > > > > > [Wed Apr 23 10:15:54 2003] [error] [client 10.0.107.84] Using a hash as > > > a reference is deprecated at > > > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/SandWeb/Config.pm line 352. > > > > these are warnings and *should* be ok.. > > > > > [Tue Apr 22 16:36:54 2003] [error] [client 10.0.107.84] [Tue Apr 22 > > > 16:36:54 2003] sandweb.cgi: Argument "" isn't numeric in alarm at > > > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/SandWeb/Shell.pm line 401., referer: > > > http://monkey/cgi-bin/sandweb.cgi?action=sandbox > > > > Someone else on the list was getting this. I need to grab perl 5.8 > > and see if I can reproduce this stuff.. SandWeb is trying to set a > > timeout value in the Shell class so that we don't run things on the > > shell forever, but it's just not getting the argument. Weird. > > > > That code is pretty new, it's been reported by Eric Lopez that > > this error occurrs when browsing very large repositories, but it > > sounds like you can't even get a checkout. It's possibly a bug > > in the code, most likely a bug that only happens in perl 5.8 > > > > I guess I'll grab a perl 5.8 build before the next RC release and > > resolve this, since alot of people are probably using it now with > > the latest Linux distros and such. > > > > > > > > > > > > > These are the main errors I am getting, the only thing that doesn't > > > appear functional is after I setup the user, repository, and go into the > > > sandbox, I cannot navigate to any of the modules I have checked out. > > > Not sure about any of the functionality after that. > > > > > > > > > I am using Apache 2.0.43/mod_perl 1.99_08/ Perl v5.8.0 > > > > > > Thanks for the help and the info. > > > > > > Bart > > > > > > On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 17:08, Rob Helmer wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 04:24:12PM -0500, Bart Metzger wrote: > > > > > Greetings > > > > > > > > Hello > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am having a few issues getting sandweb to work, and I am sure it has > > > > > to do with what I am using. Please forgive if this was mentioned in > > > > > another thread. > > > > > > > > > > I am using apache2/perl 5.8 on a rh 8.0 box. I have tried both the > > > > > latest from cvs and the RC2. > > > > > > > > > > Has anyone got this setup and working in a environment even close to > > > > > this, or do I have to stick to Apache 1.3 and perl 5.6.x? > > > > > > > > > > > > I haven't tried yet, I'm on Debian stable ( perl 5.6, apache 1.3 ). > > > > I'd be interested to see the errors you are running into. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also has anyone gotten Sandweb to authenticate to a kerberos or nis > > > > > domain? > > > > > > > > > > > > I once hacked in NT support as proof-of-concept, but I want to make > > > > this more generic and modular so we can support seperate authentication > > > > and authorization services. > > > > > > > > The basic idea is : > > > > > > > > 1) turn off MD5 Javascript hashing in the login.html and sandweb-admin > > > > 2) copy lib/SandWeb/Auth/Flatfile.pm to e.g. Kerberos.pm and make > > > > it return a 1 if the user is ok, 0 if not > > > > 3) make lib/SandWeb/Auth.pm use Kerberos.pm instead of Flatfile.pm > > > > > > > > So it's possible right now, but better to wait until this is supported > > > > by us. > > > > Then you'll just have to flip a switch in sandweb.cfg, and maybe > > > > write your own Kerberos.pm ( and send it to us so you don't have > > > > to maintain it:) ). > > > > > > > > We won't be in a position to support this until a post-1.0 release > > > > most likely. > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you need specifics please let me know. > > > > > > > > > > I am placing 2 errors at the bottom of the file in case this rings a > > > > > bell for anyone. > > > > > > > > > > > > I didn't see any errors in this email, can you resend? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Rob > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Sandweb-users mailing list > > > San...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sandweb-users > > > > > |