From: Alec W. <al...@br...> - 2010-04-27 15:22:33
|
Hi Sendu, I don't know the relationship btw Java heap size and overall memory overhead. I suspect it depends on a lot of factors. -Alec Sendu Bala wrote: > On 27/04/2010 16:08, Alec Wysoker wrote: >> Hi Sendu, >> >> Yes, I was being dense. I don't know what your hard memory limit is >> relative to what you pass to Java via -Xmx parameter. At Broad we pass >> -Xmx2G, and have a hard memory limit of 10G. You probably don't need a >> 5x multiple, but I suggest having the hard memory limit be at least >> 2-3GB larger than the -Xmx value to account for JVM overhead. > > For all of 1000 genomes I've found just 1GB greater was good enough, > which is why this one caught me by surprise. The standard overhead > should be constant, shouldn't it? And if then uses more than normal, > it's because of an inaccurate guess, as you suggested before? > > |