From: Inshan H. <ins...@gm...> - 2008-02-29 05:58:59
|
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Roshan Hewapathirana < ros...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Haniff, > Sorry for the delay. This is my view.... > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 2 > > Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:14:44 +0530 > > From: "Inshan Haniffa" <ins...@gm...> > > Subject: [sahana-maindev] Fulfil Requests- Clarification needed. > > To: "Sahana developers' list" <sah...@li...> > > Message-ID: > > <fa4...@ma...> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > Hi all, > > > > I need clarification for 'Fulfilling Requests' in the RMS (Request & Aid > > Management) module . > > > > When we are going to fulfill a request, we should select the items to be > > fulfilled the particular requirement from the pledges. > > > Agree...! > > > > > > > > Currently there can be assigned one of four status to a pledge. Those > > are, > > 1.Not confirmed - When we do a new pledge, the status is automatically > > taken > > as "Not confirmed" pledge. > > 2.Confirmed (but not delivered) - If the pledge is confirmed, the status > > can > > be changed to "Confirmed" status. > > 3.Delivered - When the pledge is delivered, the status can be changed to > > "Delivered" status. > > 4.Discarded- when the pledge is discarded. > > > > The main concern that I want to raise is, what are the pledge statuses > > to > > be considered to fulfill a request? > > Obviously not 'Discarded' > No point considering 'Not confirmed' - there, admin hasn't decided to > accept these and whether they arrive a central depot is also not sure. > > So only 'Confirmed' and 'Delivered' should be considered. 'Confirmed' are > not yet delivered to the central depot yet. 'Delivered' are already in hand. > So only include these 2. > > > > > When we going to fulfil a request, the available stock should be shown. > > What are the pledges should be shown (pledges with which statuses)? > > > If we can show 'confirmed' and 'delivered' in 2 distinct colours and > total C+D as well it is fine. > Yes . I strongly agree. > > > > OR > > Do you think that the statuses should be re-organized/ should be > > added/removed? > > What are the modifications should be made? > > > > Your suggestions are highly appreciated. Please leave a comment. > > > Your commitment is highly appreciated :-) > > > > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > Haniffa. > > > > > > -- > > M.Inshan Haniffa > > Mobile : 071-6092688 > > E-mail : ins...@cs... (university) > > ins...@gm... (private) > > ha...@op... (official) > > > Seems to be busy with looooooooot of emails . . . . (LOL) > > Cheers, > Roshan > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Sahana-maindev mailing list > Sah...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sahana-maindev > > -- M.Inshan Haniffa Mobile : 071-6092688 E-mail : ins...@cs... (university) ins...@gm... (private) ha...@op... (official) |