|
From: Frank C. <fr...@cr...> - 2014-10-20 10:40:19
|
Dimi, Okay, not an issue. The issue I see is that to implement it for different databases it is very different configuration, even if it is supported. Regards Frank On Mon, 2014-10-20 at 01:14 -0400, Dimi Paun wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Frank Crawford > <fr...@cr...> wrote: > > No, I don't think the new switch is a good idea, since the > issue is just with the Postgres dump, not MySQL or possibly > any other ones we add. > > > > I'm not sure I understand. What I'm proposing is that if the switch is > not present, we keep 100% the current situation as is, across all > database types. > It's only when it's present that we'll do what we're asked to do. > > > What am I missing? > > > > > -- > Dimi Paun <di...@la...> > Lattica, Inc. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. > Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. > Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. > Take corrective actions from your mobile device. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho > _______________________________________________ > Safekeep-devel mailing list > Saf...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/safekeep-devel |