Menu
▾
▴
SF.net SVN: safekeep: [529] safekeep/trunk/ChangeLog
|
From: <di...@us...> - 2007-06-17 22:38:38
|
Revision: 529
http://safekeep.svn.sourceforge.net/safekeep/?rev=529&view=rev
Author: dimi
Date: 2007-06-17 15:38:35 -0700 (Sun, 17 Jun 2007)
Log Message:
-----------
Update ChangeLog
Modified Paths:
--------------
safekeep/trunk/ChangeLog
Modified: safekeep/trunk/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- safekeep/trunk/ChangeLog 2007-06-17 22:37:43 UTC (rev 528)
+++ safekeep/trunk/ChangeLog 2007-06-17 22:38:35 UTC (rev 529)
@@ -1,3 +1,135 @@
+2007-06-17 22:37 +0000 [r528] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/safekeep: Update version to 1.0.1
+
+2007-06-17 22:36 +0000 [r527] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/safekeep.spec.in, safekeep/trunk/ANNOUNCE: Prepare
+ announcement for version 1.0.1.
+
+2007-06-11 04:00 +0000 [r526] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/safekeep-test: Add automatic release detection,
+ for proper Fedora 7 support.
+
+2007-06-11 00:41 +0000 [r525] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/safekeep-test: Remove support for Fedora Core 5,
+ add support for Fedora 7 and CentOS 5
+
+2007-06-10 23:02 +0000 [r524] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk, safekeep/trunk/safekeep-test: Adjust the test to
+ support also Fedora 7, which includes the distro id automatically
+ in the generated rpm names.
+
+2007-06-08 22:11 +0000 [r523] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/Makefile: Collect releases in the releases/ dir.
+
+2007-06-08 22:02 +0000 [r522] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/Makefile: Account for FC7 adding the distro id
+ (.f7) to the RPM name.
+
+2007-06-08 21:58 +0000 [r521] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/safekeep.spec.in: Make sure we don't override
+ user's configuration
+
+2007-06-08 21:55 +0000 [r520] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/debian/rules, safekeep/trunk/safekeep.spec.in:
+ Move the man pages for .backup and .conf to the server package.
+
+2007-06-08 21:49 +0000 [r519] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/safekeep.spec.in: Bit nicer gecos field.
+
+2007-06-08 20:38 +0000 [r518] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/debian/safekeep-server.postinst,
+ safekeep/trunk/Makefile, safekeep/trunk/safekeep.spec.in: Remove
+ configuration migration code, it shouldn't be necessary anymore
+ now that we reached 1.0. Besides it triggers rpm-lint errors.
+
+2007-06-08 19:46 +0000 [r517] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/debian/safekeep-server.docs,
+ safekeep/trunk/safekeep.spec.in: Do not package safekeep-test,
+ it's useful only during development, and creates all sort of
+ rpm-lint errors.
+
+2007-05-29 04:30 +0000 [r516] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/Makefile: Do not complain if we can't figure out
+ the SVN root
+
+2007-05-29 04:24 +0000 [r515] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/Makefile: Do not complain if .rpmmacros doesn't
+ exist.
+
+2007-05-28 23:58 +0000 [r514] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/safekeep.spec.in: We no longer need chsh(1).
+
+2007-05-28 15:46 +0000 [r513] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/debian/safekeep-server.postinst,
+ safekeep/trunk/safekeep.spec.in: We no longer need to have a
+ working shell for the safekeep user. Better from a security
+ perspective.
+
+2007-05-28 15:39 +0000 [r512] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/safekeep: Explicitely specify the shell to be used
+ for running the command, in case the default shell is not usable.
+ Suggested by Jeff Spaleta in order to avoid having a valid shell
+ for the safekeep account.
+
+2007-05-27 14:53 +0000 [r511] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/safekeep.spec.in: Create the safekeep user
+ following the Fedora policy:
+ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/UsersAndGroups
+
+2007-05-27 14:48 +0000 [r510] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/safekeep.spec.in: Explicitely add the group, as
+ per the Fedora policy:
+ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/UsersAndGroups The
+ rationale is: We want to invoke groupadd explicitly instead of
+ relying on useradd to create the group for us. This is because
+ useradd alone would fail if the group it tries to create already
+ existed.
+
+2007-05-27 14:45 +0000 [r509] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/safekeep.spec.in: Use abstract paths
+
+2007-05-27 14:42 +0000 [r508] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/debian/safekeep-server.prerm,
+ safekeep/trunk/safekeep.spec.in: The Fedora policy states that we
+ shouldn't delete our user:
+ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/UsersAndGroups Here
+ is the rationale: We never remove users or groups created by
+ packages. There's no sane way to check if files owned by those
+ users/groups are left behind (and even if there would, what would
+ we do to them?), and leaving those behind with ownerships
+ pointing to now nonexistent users/groups may result in security
+ issues when a semantically unrelated user/group is created later
+ and reuses the UID/GID. Also, in some setups deleting the
+ user/group might not be possible or/nor desirable (eg. when using
+ a shared remote user/group database). Cleanup of unused
+ users/groups is left to the system administrators to take care of
+ if they so desire.
+
+2007-05-16 14:09 +0000 [r499] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
+
+ * safekeep/trunk/ChangeLog: Update ChangeLog
+
2007-05-16 14:09 +0000 [r498] Dimi Paun <di...@la...>
* safekeep/trunk/safekeep: Now we're 1.0
This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's largest Open Source development site.
|
