Chris Cole - 2013-05-29

The SafeFrame Working Group recognizes that implementers will often need to add in their own proprietary functionality or desire to demonstrate new functionality in the wild prior to it becoming fully ratified and formally incorporated into the SafeFrame Specification. To keep from implementations fragmenting, I'm proposing a standard extension namespace and process.

Please review the proposal as outlined on the wiki and provide feedback.

https://sourceforge.net/p/safeframes/wiki/SafeFrame%20Extensions%20Proposal/