If I understand correctly, the problem is the way return values are handl=
ed.
Byte-sized return values are returned in a word-sized memory location. I=
had=20
missed this little detail in the libffi documentation.
If I understand correctly, this is not so for input arguments. Right?
Thanks,
Etienne
David Paul BELANGER wrote:
> Etienne,
>=20
> My bug report on the problem with libffi/SableVM on the PPC architectur=
e
> as well as the reply I received may be found here:
>=20
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D173074
>=20
> I have not study/try what they say in their reply yet.
>=20
> David
>=20
> ---
>=20
> David B=E9langer
> Graduate Student
> School of Computer Science
> McGill University
> Office: MC226
>=20
> Web page: http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~dbelan2/
> Public key: http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~dbelan2/public_key.txt
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld =3Domething 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
> _______________________________________________
> Sablevm-developer mailing list
> Sab...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sablevm-developer
>=20
> .
>=20
--=20
Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D. http://www.info.uqam.ca/~egagnon/
SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/
SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/
|
