Re: SableVM performance [Was: Re: [Sablevm-user] hello]

[Grzegorz B. P. <ga...@de...>]

On (18/04/04 23:10), Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> In comparision with JITs SableVM's interpreter achieved ex. from 0.17 to
> 0.88 performance of JikesRVM (for biger, real-life applications like Soot
> and SableCC SableVM achieved 0.88 and 0.75 performance of JikesRVM!).

I've unconsciously overlooked an important thing: this was comparison
with JikesRVM *baseline* compiler, not the optimizing one! :)  Sorry for
confusion.  But still, this is comparison betwen an interpreter and
a JIT! (though a simple one)

				GBP

-- 
Grzegorz B. Prokopski <ga...@de...>
Debian GNU/Linux      http://www.debian.org
SableVM - LGPLed JVM  http://www.sablevm.org
Why SableVM ?!?       http://devel.sablevm.org/wiki/WhySableVM