Re: [Sablevm-user] SableVM question

[Etienne M. G. <eg...@j-...>]

Hi!

Marcel Ammerlaan wrote:
>                         Name: benchmark.tar.bz2
>    benchmark.tar.bz2    Type: unspecified type (application/octet-stream)
>                     Encoding: base64


I've looked at your test2.c.  You wrote:

 goto *code_addr[data[i]];

This should have been:

 goto *datap++; 

to correspond to your switch based test.c.

Mainly, you forgot the bytecode->address pre-interpretation phase. 
Mainly, you don't have bytecodes anymnore; each bytecode is directly
replaced by its address, which is why it is much quicker (no loop, no
bound check [included in a switch], etc.) 

 ... I feel much better already;-)

Etienne
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Etienne M. Gagnon, M.Sc.                     e-mail: eg...@j-...
Author of SableVM:                             http://www.sablevm.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------