Re: [Sablevm-developer] On the 1.1.1 release and further
Brought to you by:
egagnon
From: Grzegorz B. P. <ga...@de...> - 2004-03-18 23:52:25
|
W li=B6cie z =B6ro, 10-03-2004, godz. 21:37, David B=E9langer pisze:=20 > > Another thing is SableJIT release. It's up to David when it happens, > > but I think we shouldn't wait too long with releasing this code as a > > _development_ release. We can even do it along 1.1.1, why not? I thin= k > > that this way David (and we all) could get some bugreports from the > > users or/and gain confidence that SableJIT is actually usable in > > the real, wild world ;-) And for some people word "JIT" is magical... >=20 > If you want, it could be added eventually. It is still I vote for yes, the rest is not against. I'd say: it's as _you_ want. > underdevelopment but a SableVM compiled with the JIT code is still able > to run in interpreter-only mode. In that case the JIT is never > initialized and not used and this should not make sablevm unstable. I think at this point we should release sth. like sablevm-sablejit-1.1.1 that contains all the needed code.=20 > So we could have these options: > 1) provide a sablejit patch for SableVM > 2) add SableJIT support to sablevm/staging, all code is #ifdef SABLEJIT= * though > some clutter files, especially prepared_code.c. > 3) use sablejit/staging > created subdir sablevm/ with patched SableVM > created subdir sablejit/ with Java code > In that case we have 2 staging version of SableVM, 1 with jit suppor= t, > the other without. I see... I think that svn://svn.sablevm.org/sablejit/branches/staging should only contain SableJIT code. I think this sablevm-sablejit tarball it doesn't have to come from staging. We might not call it 1.1.1 then, but: sablevm-sablejit-snapshot1.tar.gz (it can be made by re-packing tar.gz created by 'make dist' so that it unpack to sablevm-sablejit-snapshot1 directory) Would you be able to create such tarball with a short instruction how to compile it? I could then announce it along with SableVM 1.1.1 release I want to make 'test' tarballs in a few minutes, then tomorrow evening the 1.1.1 release. Would you be able to prepare tarball + instruction till friday evening? If not, then we'll make a separate release a while later. Cheers, Grzegorz B. Prokopski > > * The next thing seems to be this long-promised and awaited closer > > integration with GNU Classpath. It's in the works, I'll send more inf= o > > as soon as the idea of implementing it in realistic way stabilizes. Hmm... still waiting for Mark's response. It's over a week as I mailed him. --=20 Grzegorz B. Prokopski <ga...@de...> Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org SableVM - LGPLed JVM http://www.sablevm.org Why SableVM ?!? http://devel.sablevm.org/wiki/WhySableVM |