Re: [Sablevm-developer] Thread.interrupted() SOLVED (again? ;-)

[Chris P. <chr...@ma...>]

Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:

>Hi again,
>
>I think I finally did it, w/o any compromises on specs conformance.
>It should work fully according to Java specs about interrupt() and
>OpenGroup specs about pthread_cond_* usage and features. Though it's
>unfortunatelly much more complicated (I guess I finally found out why
>the other implementations weren't that small and simple as mine first
>;-)
>
>Anyway, the changes are in my sandbox, see:
>svn diff -r 1700:HEAD
>svn://svn.sablevm.org/developers/gadek/sandbox/svn-interrupt
>
>I want to sleep it over, but if till the evening I don't find anything
>bad in this implementation and don't get any improvement suggestions,
>I am putting that into staging.
>  
>

Why don't you try some Thread.interrupted() benchmarks and perhaps also 
some small programs that you write to call it intensively?