[Sablevm-developer] Bug#233902: marked as done (does not provide java2-runtime...should it?)
Brought to you by:
egagnon
Menu
▾
▴
[Sablevm-developer] Bug#233902: marked as done (does not provide java2-runtime...should it?)
|
From: <ow...@bu...> - 2004-02-29 01:49:47
|
Your message dated Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:52:35 -0500 with message-id <107...@ga...> and subject line [Sablevm-developer] Bug#233902: does not provide java2-runtime...should it? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2004 17:35:23 +0000 >From gal...@yo... Fri Feb 20 09:35:23 2004 Return-path: <gal...@yo...> Received: from ms-smtp-01-smtplb.rdc-nyc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com) [24.29.109.5] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AuEYd-0000lH-00; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:35:23 -0800 Received: from stallion (66-108-251-141.nyc.rr.com [66.108.251.141]) by ms-smtp-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id i1KHZGS6007701; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:35:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from galexand by stallion with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AuEYR-0000IJ-00; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:35:11 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Greg Alexander <de...@ga...> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <su...@bu...> Subject: does not provide java2-runtime...should it? X-Mailer: reportbug 2.28 Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:35:11 -0500 Message-Id: <E1AuEYR-0000IJ-00@stallion> Sender: Greg Alexander <gal...@yo...> X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Delivered-To: su...@bu... X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18 X-Spam-Level: Package: sablevm Version: 1.0.9+svn20040120-2 Severity: important Tags: sid http://packages.debian.org/unstable/virtual/java2-runtime states that sablevm provides java2-runtime. I don't know how that page was generated but it appears to be incorrect. Is that page libelous, or does sablevm provide a java2-runtime and just fails to advertise it? from /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-i386_Packages: Provides: java-virtual-machine, java1-runtime, java-runtime Note that /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/virtual-package-names-list.txt.gz from debian-policy 3.6.1.0 indicates that java-runtime is not a valid virtual package: Java and virtual machines ------------------------- java-compiler a java compiler, for Java version 1 java2-compiler a java compiler, for Java version 2 java-virtual-machine a JAVA virtual machine java1-runtime a Java runtime environment, Java version 1 java2-runtime a Java runtime environment, Java version 2 Does sablevm really implement a novel variety of java that cannot be described in the approved virtual packages? Or is this the result perhaps of an accidental application of a debian-experimental change to debian-unstable? Note that this makes all packages with Depends: java2-runtime uninstallable, as sablevm is the only installation candidate. If anyone cares to tell my ignorant self how to tell debian that I have installed java2-runtime on my own, I'd be much obliged. :) Thanks, - Greg -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux stallion 2.4.24 #4 Wed Feb 4 10:01:12 EST 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages sablevm depends on: ii java-common 0.14 Base of all Java packages ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libffi2 1:3.3.3-1 Foreign Function Interface library ii libltdl3 1.5.2-1 A system independent dlopen wrappe ii libpopt0 1.7-2 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsablevm1 1.0.9+svn20040120-2 Free implementation of JVM second ii unzip 5.50-1 De-archiver for .zip files -- no debconf information --------------------------------------- Received: (at 233902-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Feb 2004 01:27:45 +0000 >From ga...@de... Sat Feb 28 17:27:45 2004 Return-path: <ga...@de...> Received: from anis.telecom.uqam.ca [132.208.250.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AxFk8-0006PX-00; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:27:44 -0800 Received: from anis4.telecom.uqam.ca (anis4.telecom.uqam.ca [132.208.250.236]) by sortant.uqam.ca (8.12.10/8.12.1) with SMTP id i1T0tAHo016165; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:55:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from antivirus.uqam.ca ([132.208.250.6]) by anis4.telecom.uqam.ca (SAVSMTP 3.1.1.32) with SMTP id M2004022819562406510 ; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:56:24 -0500 Received: from 118.30.internet.uqam.ca (118.30.internet.uqam.ca [132.208.30.118]) by intrant.uqam.ca (8.12.10/8.12.2/uqam-filtres) with ESMTP id i1T0qcFk013628; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:52:41 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Filter: Filtre-Uqam re: ab...@uq... Subject: Re: [Sablevm-developer] Bug#233902: does not provide java2-runtime...should it? From: "Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <ga...@de...> To: Greg Alexander <de...@ga...>, 233...@bu... In-Reply-To: <E1AuEYR-0000IJ-00@stallion> References: <E1AuEYR-0000IJ-00@stallion> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Organization: Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org Message-Id: <107...@ga...> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:52:35 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by anis.telecom.uqam.ca id i1T0tAHo016165 Delivered-To: 233...@bu... X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27 X-Spam-Level: By an accident I once put Provides: java2-runtime in sablevm's debian package. There's currently no free JVM that actually provides whole java2-runtime and probably won't be in the (near) future. As most of the free JVMs, SableVM uses GNU Classpath as its classpath and is bound by what GNU Classpath supports (minus own bugs/missing features). W li=B6cie z pi=B1, 20-02-2004, godz. 12:35, Greg Alexander pisze:=20 > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/virtual/java2-runtime > states that sablevm provides java2-runtime. Lately this site often provides outdated informations. It must have catched the moment when sablevm debian package claimed to provide j2-runtime. Current version does not do it. > If anyone cares to tell my ignorant self how to tell debian that I > have installed java2-runtime on my own, I'd be much obliged. :) See /usr/share/doc/java-common/dummy-packages/ HTH GBP --=20 Grzegorz B. Prokopski <ga...@de...> Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org SableVM - LGPLed JVM http://www.sablevm.org Why SableVM ?!? http://devel.sablevm.org/wiki/WhySableVM |
