Re: [Sablevm-developer] Extending SableVM with static stack caching

[Heinrich M. <ma...@he...>]

Hi Etienne, hi Grzegorz!

First of all: Thanks for your input!

"Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <ga...@de...> writes:
> W li¶cie z ¶ro, 11-02-2004, godz. 01:55, Etienne Gagnon pisze: 
>> Heinrich Moser wrote:
>> > * What version should I use?
>> Currently: The "staging" version.  It's the best one available for the moment.
>> Soon, Greg (Grzegorz) and David will release a "bugfree" version which would
>> also be an interesting candidate.
>
> Surely not 1.0.9. I'd say that if you want to develop things - "staging"
> is most likely to be good choice, especially, if you want to be able to
> often feed your improvements back into "staging". [*] But you might
> want to start from some better recognizable point, like ex. the
> soon-to-be-released 1.1.0.

OK, then I'll do some preliminary work and testing with 1.0.9 and then
grab 1.1.0 as soon as it's available.

>> Ideally, whichever version you pick, you should be working within a
>> Subversion working copy, so that you can easily extract "patches" against
>> a "precise" version, e.g.
> Definitely. It will save you lots of time.

I'll do that.

>>> * Did someone already try some benchmarks on SableVM?
>> Look in my Ph.D. thesis for some performance numbers.  Others (Greg, David, Chris...)
>> might have additional information.  (BTF, AshesX, ... ???)
> See latest mails from Chris, with some results. I also had some, but they'll
> have to be repeated.

Thanks. I've also tried some Java Grande myself in the meantime and
compared them to Chris' output.

> Welcome, and wish you happy hacking!

Thanks. :-) I'll keep you informed about any interesting insights.

SG,
    Heinzi