Re: [Sablevm-developer] debbuggtk improvements and synchronization w/ gnu classpath

[Etienne G. <gag...@uq...>]

David B=E9langer wrote:
> I looked quickly.  The only change that require some work is the split
> of Runtime into VMRuntime/Runtime.  It should not be difficult and
> should not take time.  I could have staging updated tonight or tomorrow=
=2E

Super.

> So, that means next term we merge, we will need to use a revision
> number.  It would not be better to use tag like cvs-yyyy-mm-dd, althoug=
h
> technically revision number do not cause problem?

Not really.  Revisions numbers are quite sufficient, in this case.  We mi=
ght do
such updates quite regularly; adding tags won't help at all.  In fact, th=
ey would
obscure the important tags.

[I think along the lines of: "would you tag every staging revision?"]


--=20
Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D.             http://www.info.uqam.ca/~egagnon/
SableVM:                                       http://www.sablevm.org/
SableCC:                                       http://www.sablecc.org/