Re: [Sablevm-developer] Declaring SableVM ported to Windows... tomorrow ;-)

[Chris P. <chr...@ma...>]

>
> I don't think they would make the exception to allow you to build an 
> LGPL'd .dll if the resulting program was GPL'd automatically at 
> runtime just because you're forced to link to cygwin1.dll.  That's 
> misleading and I don't think Cygwin is out to mislead people.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>

Unless that really is the case, and it's a special case in the licensing 
that Cygwin did not realize.  Maybe Greg you should ask on one of the 
Cygwin lists?