Re: [Sablevm-developer] Flushing strategy ....

[Gunda D. <sab...@ho...>]

>On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 03:17:33PM -0700, Gunda Domlur wrote:
> > Bottom-line: I think it is better off to provide iflush with a second 
>size
> > parameter and leave the implementation specfic for a particular
> > architecture implementation.
> >
> > What say you ?
>
>Agreed.
>

So how difficult it is to change the iflush to include a second parameter 
(for indicating size) in sablevm ? Is it trivial or does it take lot of 
effort ?

Later,
-Gunda


_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail