Re: [Sablevm-developer] Status question(s)

[Grzegorz P. <gr...@se...>]

W li=B6cie z pon, 14-10-2002, godz. 02:48, Etienne M. Gagnon pisze:=20
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 11:20:58PM +0200, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
> > W li?cie z pi?, 11-10-2002, godz. 22:02, Etienne M. Gagnon pisze:=20
> > > 5- Solve the multiple-achitecture GNU auto* tools problems you are
> > > raising in this message.
> > Could you please move it to the front of the list?
> I forgot to say: my list was *unordered*.  I was just trying to sum up
> all the "todo" work, and asking people for some ordering.  I guess I
> should put "5-" at the top. ;-)

Yes, please. It is somewhat critical. And:
1. release more current 1.0.5 w/ ia64 and other your improvements
2. tell me what you think about totally-auto-config patch ( I agree
that #if GNUC should stay, but what about the rest? the main?)

ad 1. It's non-critilal - at least for me and I am more interested in
ad 2. I'd like to push this thing further as the testing here will
take time. We need to put the patch onto autobuilders, see what's
breaking, fix stuff, upload again, package mauve, ask users of
all arches to use mauve tests.

Hmm... I just thought about sablevm-test package. It could
build-dep on sablevm, mauve and other needed pieces and
while building - it could just run all the tests we can be
interested in. Of course it would be autobuilded (or I'd better
say "autotested") on _all_ of debian architectures thus - making it
easy to run any test we can dream of ;-))

I think I prepare the package quickly (this week) so that ftpmaster
had time to let it in.

Regards

				Grzegorz B. Prokopski