[Sablevm-developer] Re: sablevm_1.0.1-4_i386.changes REJECTED

[Grzegorz P. <ga...@de...>]

W li=B6cie z czw, 22-08-2002, godz. 00:17, James Troup pisze:=20
> Hi,
> =20
>  Your lib and dev package look a little wacky, as in the -dev package
>  doesn't contain much.  lintian says:
> =20
>  W: libsablevm1: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libsablevm.so.1.0=
.1 usr/lib/libsablevm.so
> =20
>  Also, lintian is whining about duplicate license files.  Please fix
>  the latter and the former (or explain what I'm missing).

I uploaded new version. Changelog below explains everything.

sablevm (1.0.1-5) unstable; urgency=3Dlow

  * Trying again. Closes: #156019
  * moved .so library symlink and .la file to -dev package
  * note to ftpmaster: -dev is needed because /usr/include/*.h files
    conflict with some other (entire) JVMs in Debian and I don't want
    sablevm to conflict with them
  * note to ftpmaster: extra licenses in /usr/share/sablevm are used by
    sablevm binary to display licensing and authors informations -
    that's author's explict wish to have it this way (instead of for
    ex. hardcoded in binary); as /usr/share/sablevm/COPYING.LIB is the
    same as /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1 - I symlinked them
  * note to ftpmaster: having separate libsablevm package was proposed
    by upstream, discussed and agreed as The Right Thing(tm)
  * note to ftpmaster: if you have some other technical problems with
    this package - please file a bugreport or just mail me; I'll
    explain/fix remaining isses ASAP; rejecting the package worries me
    and I am afraid if it won't make it waiting another week for
    acceptance. thank you for your understanding

 -- Grzegorz Prokopski (Debian Developer) <ga...@de...>  Thu, 22
Aug 2002 03:46:50 +0200

Regards

					Grzegorz B. Prokopski