Re: [Sablevm-developer] RE: Game-Plan

[Etienne M. G. <eg...@j-...>]

Hi Again.

Brent Fulgham wrote:
> Also, Per Bothner (we talked to him earlier this week) has
> a write-up (http://sources.redhat.com/java/papers/native++.html)
> that he did.

Hmmm... This document seems as an early draft for CNI.  I would
personally be inclined to stick to C for native code.  JNI overhead is
bad enough, adding to that C++ overhead might no be ideal for key Java
library methods.  But I know that some Classpath developer would prefer
using C++/CNI (where CNI would be implemented as a JNI wrapper).

Etienne
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Etienne M. Gagnon, M.Sc.                     e-mail: eg...@j-...
Author of SableVM:                             http://www.sablevm.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------